Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Paragard IUD Lawsuit – May 2025 Update

BOOK A FREE CONSULTATION

The Paragard IUD is a popular form of contraception that has gained attention due to growing concerns over severe complications and device breakage during removal. These issues have led injured victims and their families to explore their legal options and seek justice.

If you or a loved one have experienced complications or injuries due to the Paragard IUD, you may have the right to bring a legal case to request compensation for your losses. The Paragard IUD is a birth control device linked to serious side effects, including organ perforation, migration, and infertility.

We understand that dealing with these issues can be overwhelming and emotionally challenging. At Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers, we are here to help. Talk to our experienced team of dangerous medical device lawyers to see if we can bring a Paragard IUD lawsuit to fight for your rights.

Contact us today to schedule a free consultation, and let us guide you through the legal process. Simply call 833-552-7274, and someone will be ready to speak with you.

SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION

BOOK A FREE CONSULTATION

Paragard IUD Lawsuit Updates – May 2025

Before we discuss these defective medical device claims in detail below, let’s examine the current status of the pending litigation. On this page, we’ll update you about any lawsuit progress and what to expect in the near future. Be sure to return often to follow the Paragard Multidistrict Litigation as it proceeds.

May 1, 2025 – Paragard IUD Lawsuit: Signs of Progress and Possible Settlements

There are new signs that the Paragard IUD lawsuit may be moving closer to resolution. Attorneys on both sides are now focused on wrapping up fact witness depositions, debating who can still be called to testify, and under what terms. These are the final steps of fact discovery, and reaching this stage is often a sign that the litigation is entering its final stretch.

Also worth noting—there was a noticeable spike in case filings last month. The MDL added 71 new lawsuits, pushing the total to over 3,000 claims. That kind of jump usually means lawyers suspect that settlement talks are heating up. When that happens, there’s often a rush to file before any deadlines are set, which could limit who qualifies to join.

If you believe you’ve been harmed by a broken or defective Paragard IUD, this may be the right time to act. Once settlements are on the table, waiting too long could mean missing your chance to file. Reach out to the Dolman Law Group team to learn how you can protect your right to receive compensation for your injuries.


April 1, 2025 – Court Denies Case Reinstatements But Allows Corporate Depositions to Proceed

On March 26, the court refused to reinstate six lawsuits that had previously been dismissed with prejudice. Those cases were dropped after plaintiffs failed to submit the required Plaintiff Fact Sheets and ignored a December 2024 court order demanding they explain the delay. Despite having multiple chances to respond, none of the plaintiffs complied. When they later asked the judge to reconsider, the court said no—emphasizing that procedural compliance is crucial in a massive MDL like this one, which involves thousands of plaintiffs and complex claims against multiple defendants.

Earlier in the month, the judge also weighed in on a dispute regarding 30(b)(6) depositions. These are interviews where corporate representatives testify on behalf of the company. Defendants tried to avoid them altogether, but the judge denied that effort, allowing plaintiffs to move ahead. The court will still consider some limits to the questioning, but overall, this is a win for plaintiffs seeking internal insight from the companies involved.

Finally, the litigation itself continues to grow. As of early March, 28 new cases were added in the prior 30 days, bringing the total number of active lawsuits in the Paragard MDL to 2,965. Most claims center on the IUD breaking during removal and causing painful, sometimes serious complications.


March 1, 2025 – Bellwether Trials Delayed, Some Cases Dismissed Due to Filing Deadlines

In a recent court order, the schedule for the first bellwether trials in the Paragard IUD litigation has been pushed back. This marks the fourth scheduling adjustment, now setting the first trial date for January 12, 2026. The second trial is planned for March 3, 2026, with the third following on May 11, 2026. To reflect these changes, the discovery timeline has also been updated.

Meanwhile, some plaintiffs have seen their cases dismissed after Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical, the manufacturers of the Paragard IUD, successfully argued that claims filed in New York, Idaho, Alabama, Mississippi, Michigan, Virginia, and Texas violated state-specific statutes of limitations. See our update below dated September 16, 2024. The court ruled that the clock on these cases started when the devices fractured—not when plaintiffs later realized the full extent of their injuries.

In its decision, the judge determined that the “present injury” occurred at the moment of device breakage, even if the damage wasn’t immediately evident or didn’t require emergency intervention. As a result, women in these states are now barred from seeking compensation, despite the fact that they had evidence supporting a fraudulent concealment argument. The court refused to extend the filing deadline, reasoning that plaintiffs should have acted as soon as the fracture occurred—regardless of whether they were fully aware of its consequences at the time.


February 15, 2025 – Inadequate Warnings a Key Issue in Paragard IUD Cases

A major focus of the ongoing litigation is the argument that Paragard’s warning labels were dangerously insufficient. Plaintiffs contend that Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical were aware of the risks associated with the device breaking and migrating inside the body—often requiring surgery to remove—but failed to provide adequate warnings. For years, the only warning included in the product labeling addressed potential breakage during removal, and that warning was only added after an FDA mandate in 2019.

Defendants may claim that a stronger warning would have unnecessarily alarmed potential users. However, plaintiffs argue that a more detailed disclosure could have led to fewer doctors recommending the device, fewer women choosing it, changes in removal procedures, and, ultimately, fewer injuries. Instead, the manufacturers allegedly downplayed the risks to avoid jeopardizing sales and profits.

The FDA is now reevaluating safety warnings for IUDs, including Paragard. While any updates to the label would likely be inadmissible as evidence in court, they could help prevent future harm by ensuring women are fully informed of the risks before choosing this form of contraception.


February 11, 2025 – Paragard MDL Expands to 2,937 Cases

The multidistrict litigation (MDL) for the Paragard IUD continues to grow, with 55 new cases added in January alone. As of February 2025, the total number of lawsuits has reached 2,937, reflecting the widespread concerns about the device’s tendency to break during removal or at other times.

Thousands of women have reported serious injuries linked to Paragard’s design, and the rising case count underscores the ongoing demand for accountability from the manufacturers, Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical. Like many other lawsuits against medical device companies, this litigation highlights the devastating consequences of prioritizing profits over patient safety.

With the first bellwether trials approaching later this year, plaintiffs are diligently preparing their cases. These early trials will be critical in determining how the broader litigation may unfold and whether the manufacturers will face substantial financial liability for the harm caused by their product.


February 6, 2025 – Bellwether Trials Scheduled for Late 2025

The Paragard IUD lawsuits remain consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, where Judge Leigh Martin May is overseeing the proceedings. In a recent announcement, the Court scheduled the first bellwether trial for December 1, 2025, with a second trial set for February 2, 2026. These dates remain contingent on the availability of defense counsel.

Although litigation is already well underway, new plaintiffs can still file lawsuits over Paragard’s alleged defects and join the MDL. As the bellwether trials approach, their outcomes will likely shape future settlement discussions and set important legal precedents for the thousands of women seeking justice.


October 7, 2024 – Drop in Paragard MDL Cases for the First Time in Five Years

For the first time in half a decade, the Paragard multidistrict litigation (MDL) saw a decline in pending cases last month. In September, the total number of lawsuits dropped by 49, however, this decrease appears to be part of the natural ebb and flow of MDLs rather than a significant trend, as 12 new cases were already added in early October.

Looking ahead, plaintiffs remain on track to depose Dr. Barton Cobert in Baltimore on November 25, 2024—unless a global Paragard settlement is reached beforehand. We’ll continue to provide updates as the litigation develops.


September 28, 2024 – Dr. Cobert’s Deposition is Set for November

Plaintiffs in the Paragard IUD litigation are preparing to question Dr. Barton Cobert in late November regarding a drug safety audit he performed in 2010 related to Paragard. His testimony will focus on a pharmacovigilance review he conducted in 2010 for Paragard, which could provide key insights into drug safety monitoring at that time.

If “pharmacovigilance” sounds like an overly technical term, here’s what it means: it refers to the monitoring of drug safety, including the detection, assessment, and prevention of adverse effects from medications and medical devices. These audits play a crucial role in ensuring that pharmaceutical companies are following proper safety protocols and compliance measures.

Dr. Cobert’s deposition will be a pivotal moment in the litigation, as his findings may shed light on the precautions—or lack thereof—that were in place when Paragard was being evaluated for safety. His testimony could provide valuable evidence for the plaintiffs and the court as the case progresses.


September 16, 2024 – Teva Moves to Dismiss 236 Paragard Cases Over Filing Deadlines

Teva Pharmaceuticals has filed a motion to dismiss 236 lawsuits in the Paragard MDL, arguing that these claims are barred by various statutes of limitations. The company’s request categorizes the challenged cases into three groups: those where the legal clock allegedly started running at the time of the plaintiff’s Paragard removal surgery, cases blocked by the statute of repose, and claims that state law prohibits under strict liability rules.

However, the issue of fraudulent concealment could complicate Teva’s attempt to have these cases thrown out, as a jury may ultimately need to decide whether the statute of limitations should apply. Even if some dismissals were granted—which remains unlikely—these cases could still hold settlement value, as Teva may prefer to avoid lengthy appeals. This move appears to be a strategic effort to clear out certain claims in anticipation of a potential global Paragard settlement.


September 6, 2024 – Missouri Woman Joins Paragard MDL with New Lawsuit

A Missouri woman has filed a new lawsuit against Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical, further expanding the growing Paragard MDL. Like many other plaintiffs, she alleges that her Paragard IUD fractured during removal, leading to severe pain, emotional distress, and the possibility of additional surgeries to address the complications.

Her lawsuit brings multiple claims against the manufacturers, including strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty, fraud, and violations of consumer protection laws. She has also requested a jury trial and may amend her complaint if further medical complications arise. As the litigation continues, cases like this underscore the widespread allegations against the companies and the ongoing demand for accountability.


September 3, 2024 – Paragard MDL Gains 57 New Cases in August

After experiencing a slight dip in case numbers the previous month, the Paragard MDL saw renewed growth in August, adding 57 new lawsuits. This increase brings the total number of pending cases to 2,793, signaling that litigation over the defective IUD remains active and ongoing.


September 1, 2024 – Plaintiffs Seek to Name Teva as a Formal Defendant

Plaintiffs in the Paragard MDL have filed a motion to amend their Master Personal Injury Complaint to officially include Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. as a named defendant. In response, Teva has opposed the request, arguing that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the necessary diligence required for such an amendment.

However, new documents have shed light on Teva Ltd.’s role in the matter, strengthening the plaintiffs’ position. Since adding Teva at this stage would not unfairly prejudice the defense, the motion could succeed. As the litigation unfolds, this effort to hold Teva Ltd. accountable highlights the evolving understanding of corporate responsibility in the case.

Reviewing the Basics: What Is the Paragard IUD?

The Paragard IUD is a long-term contraceptive device that provides non-hormonal birth control. It is a T-shaped intrauterine device made of plastic wrapped in a small amount of copper. The copper promotes an inflammatory reaction within the uterus, which creates an inhospitable environment for sperm, preventing pregnancy. Unlike hormonal IUDs, the Paragard IUD does not release any hormones into the body.

Complications Associated with the Paragard IUD

While the Paragard IUD may be an effective form of contraception, it is not without risks. Many users have reported experiencing severe complications, including device breakage during removal, migration of the device within the body, uterine perforation, pain, scarring, and infections. These complications can have a significant impact on the physical and emotional well-being of the affected individuals.

Device breakage during removal is one of the most common issues reported by Paragard IUD users. When the device breaks during removal, surgical intervention may be necessary to remove all the fragments. This can be a painful and invasive procedure that can lead to further complications and require additional medical treatment.

Another serious complication associated with the Paragard IUD is the device’s migration within the body. The device can move from its original position, potentially causing internal injuries and damage to nearby organs. In some cases, surgical intervention may be necessary to remove the device or repair any damages caused.

Uterine perforation is a rare but serious complication that can occur during the insertion process. It refers to the device puncturing the uterine wall, potentially causing internal bleeding and damage to surrounding organs. Individuals who experience uterine perforation may require immediate medical attention and surgical intervention.

In addition to physical complications, these issues take a significant emotional toll that you should not ignore. Many victims experience pain, discomfort, and emotional distress as a result of the complications caused by the Paragard IUD. These negative experiences can significantly impact their daily lives and overall well-being.

Why Are Lawsuits Being Filed Against Paragard?

Numerous allegations against the manufacturer of the Paragard IUD have led to lawsuits by affected individuals. One key allegation is the failure of the manufacturer to provide adequate warnings about the risks associated with device breakage during removal. The company did not sufficiently inform users about the potential complications that can arise during the removal process, leading to unexpected injuries and the need for surgical intervention.

Another allegation against the manufacturer is negligence in designing a product prone to breakage and other complications. Design defects in the Paragard IUD likely contributed to the high incidence of device breakage during removal and other complications. Users argue that the manufacturer should have taken appropriate measures to ensure the safety and reliability of the product.

Furthermore, there are allegations that the manufacturer did not take timely action to recall or address known defects of the Paragard IUD. The manufacturer allegedly knew about the risks and issues associated with the product but failed to take appropriate steps to protect the safety of its users. This alleged negligence has resulted in unnecessary harm and suffering for many individuals.

The lawsuits against the manufacturer aim to hold them accountable for their negligence and seek compensation for the harm caused to patients. Victims are seeking justice for the physical and emotional trauma they have endured, as well as the financial burdens associated with medical treatment and ongoing care. These legal actions also aim to raise awareness about the dangers of defective medical devices and push for stronger regulations to protect public health.

Potential Compensation in Paragard IUD Claims

Victims of complications and injuries caused by the Paragard IUD may be eligible for various compensation forms. Remember to note that each case is unique, and the damages awarded will depend on the circumstances. However, you may pursue the following compensation forms in Paragard IUD lawsuits:

  • Medical Expenses: Victims may be entitled to compensation for the costs related to surgeries, follow-up care, and ongoing medical treatment. This can include hospital bills, medication, rehabilitation, and other related medical expenses.
  • Lost income: If the complications caused by the Paragard IUD have resulted in time missed from work, victims may be entitled to compensation for lost income. This can help offset the financial burden of not working on recovery or medical appointments.
  • Pain and Suffering: In Paragard IUD lawsuits, you can pursue compensation for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of quality of life. Victims should not overlook the physical and emotional toll they experience, and compensation for these intangible losses can help them in their journey toward healing and recovery.
  • Punitive Damages: In cases of gross negligence, The court may award punitive damages to punish the manufacturer and deter future misconduct. These damages go beyond compensating the individual and serve as a punishment for the responsible party.

Be sure to consult with a knowledgeable Paragard IUD lawsuit lawyer from our firm to understand the potential compensation available in your case. They will assess your situation and work diligently to ensure you receive the full and fair compensation. With their experience, you can navigate the legal complexities and increase your chances of a successful outcome.

Why Choose Dolman Law Group for Your Paragard IUD Case?

When seeking legal representation for injuries or complications related to the Paragard IUD, you need a dedicated law firm that understands the complexities of product liability and medical device lawsuits. Dolman Law Group has the skills and resources to stand up for your rights and seek justice. Here’s why you should trust us with your Paragard IUD lawsuit:

With over 120 years of combined legal experience, our attorneys have handled numerous complex cases involving defective medical devices, including lawsuits against major pharmaceutical companies. We have a deep understanding of the legal and medical issues involved in Paragard IUD claims, from device breakage to severe complications. Trust our seasoned team to build a compelling case tailored to your unique circumstances.

Resources to Take on Big Corporations

Pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers often have significant financial and legal resources. At Dolman Law Group, we level the playing field. Our firm has the resources to hire medical professionals, conduct thorough investigations, and gather the evidence to hold these corporations accountable. We are relentless in our pursuit of justice and will not back down against powerful opponents.

Every Paragard IUD case is unique, and we treat it that way. Whether your case involves injuries from device migration, breakage during removal, or other severe complications, we take the time to understand your experience and its impact on your life. Our team will work closely with you to develop a personalized legal strategy that seeks the maximum compensation you deserve.

Free and Confidential Consultations

We understand that taking legal action after a medical device injury can feel overwhelming. That’s why we offer free and confidential consultations. During this initial meeting, we’ll listen to your story, provide an honest evaluation of your case, and outline the steps we can take to pursue justice on your behalf. You won’t pay anything unless we win your case. We aim to provide you with peace of mind, knowing you have an experienced legal team fighting for your rights every step of the way.

National Recognition and Proven Success

Dolman Law Group is proud to be recognized as a leading personal injury and product liability law firm. Our attorneys have been honored with accolades such as the National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Lawyers and inclusion in Best Lawyers. These distinctions reflect our unwavering dedication to achieving outstanding results for our clients, including those affected by defective medical devices like the Paragard IUD.

Committed to Justice for Victims

We aim to hold medical device manufacturers accountable for negligence and unsafe products. We fight tirelessly to ensure that victims of the Paragard IUD’s dangerous side effects receive the compensation they deserve, including coverage for medical bills, lost earnings, pain and suffering, and more. We are committed to justice for our clients and driving industry-wide changes that prioritize patient safety.

If you or a loved one has suffered injuries or complications from the Paragard IUD, Dolman Law Group is here to help. Contact us today for a free, confidential consultation, and let us guide you through the legal process as you seek justice and compensation.

With offices across the Florida coast and nationwide, you can easily reach Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers, PA, at 833-552-7274 or use our online contact page.

How Our Paragard IUD Lawyers Can Help

Navigating the legal landscape surrounding product liability cases can be detailed and challenging. That’s why you should always seek the guidance of an experienced Paragard IUD lawsuit lawyer. Here are some ways our Paragard IUD lawsuit attorneys can help:

  • Case Evaluation: Our lawyers will review the details of your experience to determine the eligibility of your lawsuit. They will assess the strength of your case and advise you on the best course of action.
  • Gathering Evidence: Attorneys will gather critical evidence to build a strong case on your behalf. This may include obtaining medical records, manufacturer warnings, professional opinions, and other relevant documentation.
  • Managing the Legalities: Our attorneys understand the intricacies of product liability law and take steps to fulfill all legal requirements. They will guide you through the legal process, protecting your rights.
  • Negotiating Settlements: Many Paragard IUD lawsuit cases settle outside court. Our firm’s skilled Paragard IUD attorney will negotiate on your behalf to secure fair compensation without prolonged litigation. They will fight for the best possible outcome for you.
  • Litigation Support: If your case proceeds to trial, your attorney will represent you. They will present a compelling case, utilizing their skills and knowledge to advocate for your rights and seek the compensation you deserve.

Who Is Eligible to File a Paragard IUD Lawsuit?

Individuals who have experienced complications and injuries as a result of using the Paragard IUD may be eligible to file a lawsuit. This includes those who have experienced device breakage during removal, suffered injuries such as uterine perforation, infections, or organ damage, and required surgical intervention to remove broken device fragments.

Acting promptly is important if you believe you have a case. Statutes of limitations vary by state, establishing deadlines for filing lawsuits. Failure to act within these deadlines can result in losing your right to seek compensation. Therefore, consult with a Paragard IUD lawsuit attorney as soon as possible to protect your rights and explore your legal options.

Matthew Dolman, Paragard IUD Lawsuit Lawyer

Contact Our Seasoned Paragard IUD Lawsuit Lawyers Today

If you or a loved one have been affected by the complications of the Paragard IUD, don’t navigate this journey alone. Our seasoned Paragard IUD lawsuit lawyers are here to guide you through the legal process and fight for justice and compensation on your behalf. Schedule a free consultation with the Dolman Law Group Accident Injury Lawyers today by calling 833-552-7274. Don’t wait; take the first step towards seeking justice and rebuilding your life.

SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION

BOOK A FREE CONSULTATION

FAQ’s

When you’re seriously injured in an accident, you may need to hire a personal injury lawyer to handle your claim, but exactly what does a personal injury lawyer do? Most people know that if you are hurt in a car accident, personal injury law firms can help you recover compensation for your injuries. However, most […]

READ MORE

Hopefully, you will never need to bring a wrongful death case. But if you lose a loved one in an accident that was caused by someone else’s negligent or reckless behavior, you need to understand exactly what does a wrongful death lawyer do and why do you need one? A wrongful death lawyer handles civil […]

READ MORE

truetrue